FALL-THROUGH ENGINEFar North Care Β· shift recovery
06:05 AESTΒ· Priya watching
πŸ€’

Steph called in β€” sick child

7:00am Β· Aitkenvale Β· personal care + morning routine Β· behaviour support plan (familiar faces matter)

55m
to shift start
speed

Cascade Β· ranked survivors

3 eligible

Hard gates Β· excluded

4 blocked + logged
Every excluded carer has a logged reason β€” "why didn't the system call me?" always has an answer. Tara is known to the participant and would've ranked #1 on continuity, but a lapsed clearance is an absolute gate: no override, even in a 6am panic. That's the line that keeps you out of an audit finding.

SCHADS repricing

replacement Β· priced before you confirm
Carer is paid (SCHADS)$86.60
Org can claim (NDIS)$95.40
Margin on this fill$8.80
Thin but positive. Min-engagement + short-notice loaded the pay side; NDIS short-notice provisions cover most of it on the claim side. You see this before confirming β€” no silent loss three weeks later in payroll.
⚑ Family auto-notified
M
"Morning β€” Steph's home sick today. Maria is covering the 7am. She's supported [participant] 14 times before, so it's a familiar face. Arriving ~6:58. Any concerns, reply here."
The "familiar face" line only appears because it's true β€” continuity surfaced honestly to reassure. If the only fill had been a stranger, the message would say so plainly and give a contact point. Direction, not false comfort.
End to end: 7 candidates β†’ 4 excluded at the hard gates (each logged + answerable) β†’ 3 ranked survivors β†’ cascade contacts Maria first (continuity 0.35 weight wins despite Jenna being only slightly further) β†’ she replies YES in 42s β†’ shift locks, the other two voided β†’ SCHADS reprices for Maria's circumstances β†’ pay vs claim vs margin surfaced before confirm β†’ family notified with an honest familiar-face line. Hole filled in 4 minutes β€” correctly, legally, no payroll surprise.